Pragmatism and Moral Objectivity
نویسندگان
چکیده
Most non-robust-realist metaethical theories, such as expressivism, constructivism, and non-robust forms of realism, claim to retain a sense objectivity in ethics. A persistent issue for these theories is identify an objective criterion moral truth that meets their objectivist aspiration. Objectivist aspirations are often probed by confronting non-realists with abject normative positions, those rational racists, which licensed the framework respective non-realist theory but nevertheless strike us wrong. In cases, face dilemma. Either they allow anything goes thereby forgo or disallow positions. latter case, however, have nothing turn subjective criteria ultimately related one’s personal outlook. This unacceptably smug. I argue pragmatism spirit Charles S. Peirce partially solves this True belief would withstand experience argument were we inquire far fruitfully could on matter. elucidate notion pragmatist construal provides substantive, determine value claims, without recourse criteria. puts ahead rival theories.
منابع مشابه
Round 2A: Finding Objectivity and Causality in Pragmatism – A Response to Held
In previous writings, I have set forth a rationale for the foundational knowledge value in psychology and psychotherapy of (a) the individual, systematic case study, and (b) inductive generalizations derived from databases of large numbers of such case studies. This rationale is build upon the epistemology and ontology of contemporary philosophical pragmatism and social constructionism as appli...
متن کاملMoral Objectivity and Reasonable Agreement: Can Realism Be Reconciled with Kantian Constructivism?
In this paper I analyze the tension between realism and antirealism at the basis of Kantian constructivism. This tension generates a conflictive account of the source of the validity of social norms. On the one hand, the claim to moral objectivity characteristic of Kantian moral theories makes the validity of norms depend on realist assumptions concerning the existence of shared fundamental int...
متن کاملJerome Bruner and William James Regarding Pragmatism ’ s Does Pragmatism
As its most basic mission, pragmatism sets out to determine an idea’s merit by examining its practical consequences, rather than through purely abstract evaluation. As a result of this emphasis on an idea’s effectiveness, the complex ways in which pragmatists conceive of abstract notions such as truth and self-concept are often overlooked. Close examination of the works of two pragmatist thinke...
متن کاملCan Pragmatism Be Radical? Richard Posner and Legal Pragmatism
ions such as justice, fairness, and equality. Posner argues that “academic philosophy” is “a field that has essentially no audience among judges and lawyers—let alone among politicians—even when philosophy is taken up by law professors . . . who think it should influence law.” Legal pragmatists reject “abstract theorizing of which professors of constitutional 62. See J.M. Balkin, The Declaratio...
متن کاملIdealism and Pragmatism
1. The Problem I begin with a gloomy observation on monastic education by Phra Prayud Payutto (1939) of Thailan whom Tambiah calls "a brilliant scholar-monk" [1]. Payutto said in 1984: "The present state of m education is similar to a sky which has some spots of sunshine, but is in fact full of cloud. The sky is n clear. When monks themselves see the dull and overcast sky they may feel disheart...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2036-4091']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.2677